Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
I, President Maxon of Free Land of Baelgaria, propose that the nations of Sermo collaborate to cut down on industrial and agricultural water pollution. The runoff into oceans and lakes is also affecting the fishing market and sea life in general.
Baelgaria's official standing on SS#013 - FOR.
Please Discuss. Discussions shall close May 21 at 6:00 PST
Voting shall start May 21 6:00 PST
Official Resolution
Enact "Imposing Limits on Water Pollution"
Resolution SS#013
Proposed by: President Maxon
Description: A resolution to reduce environmental impact
Argument: That the nations of Sermo are not regulating the dumping of industrial, agricultural and otherwise hazardous waste into bodies of water.
DEFINING hazardous waste as byproducts of business that can be harmful to human, animal or marine life through chemical, radioactive, explosive, or toxic means.
ACKNOWLEDGING that Manufacturing, Agriculture, Chemical, and other industries produce hazardous amounts of waste that is commonly dumped and/or rinsed into bodies of water by runoff.
BELIEVING that the hazardous waste produced by these industries could be dealt with responsibly and/or stored to prevent runoff into rivers and streams.
NOTING that Agricultural waste could be cut down on by limiting use of pesticides that are harmful when added to a marine environment full of life.
KNOWING that responsible management and/or storage of these wastes can be expensive.
BELIEVING that no cost is great enough to warrant damaging the environment, especially environments that contribute to industries such as fishing.
NOTING that previously mentioned industries may designate dumping zones that have a proven method of preventing the waste from seeping into the environment managed by a government body.
PROCLAIMING that all industrial, agricultural, chemical, and other business, private and public, responsibly prevent hazardous waste from making its way into bodies of water. Whether it be through directly dumping or indirect runoff into lakes, rivers, streams, creeks, ponds, marshes, swamps, oceans, or any other body of water inhabited by marine life.
The Sermo Senate hereby enacts resolution #013, "Imposing Limits on Water Pollution"
Baelgaria's official standing on SS#013 - FOR.
Please Discuss. Discussions shall close May 21 at 6:00 PST
Voting shall start May 21 6:00 PST
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Synavia is against this resolution, it would cost too much in taxpayer money. I say this because my citizens, having a 49% income tax rate, surely do not need any more.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
We do not support this proposal, as the Hippo River is a nice little place to dump all our toxic stuff. Where would we put all of our toxic materials if we couldn't dump it into the river and to the sea?
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
President Newlark wrote:Synavia is against this resolution, it would cost too much in taxpayer money. I say this because my citizens, having a 49% income tax rate, surely do not need any more.
Then force the companies to pay the necessary money required for dumping the hazardous materials, and give them huge fines if they violate it.
Darth GW7- Posts : 204
Join date : 2011-03-01
Location : Deanor, Frenzland
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
You're an idiot, you know that? The environment is much more important than your [whiney]little toxic waste problem[/whiney].Hippo wrote:We do not support this proposal, as the Hippo River is a nice little place to dump all our toxic stuff. Where would we put all of our toxic materials if we couldn't dump it into the river and to the sea?
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Darth GW7 wrote:President Newlark wrote:Synavia is against this resolution, it would cost too much in taxpayer money. I say this because my citizens, having a 49% income tax rate, surely do not need any more.
Then force the companies to pay the necessary money required for dumping the hazardous materials, and give them huge fines if they violate it.
Unfortunately, in Synavia, large corporations tend to be against the law (a trait dating from the age of President Adams). They'd just lie about it. I would agree to this resolution if only it didn't cost so much in taxpayer money. Synavia cares about the environment, and will do everything it can to help it out, so long as it doesn't force our tax rate above 60%.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Miles underground?Hippo wrote:We do not support this proposal, as the Hippo River is a nice little place to dump all our toxic stuff. Where would we put all of our toxic materials if we couldn't dump it into the river and to the sea?
Then send government officials to check up on the supposed dumping sites?President Newlark wrote:Darth GW7 wrote:President Newlark wrote:Synavia is against this resolution, it would cost too much in taxpayer money. I say this because my citizens, having a 49% income tax rate, surely do not need any more.
Then force the companies to pay the necessary money required for dumping the hazardous materials, and give them huge fines if they violate it.
Unfortunately, in Synavia, large corporations tend to be against the law (a trait dating from the age of President Adams). They'd just lie about it. I would agree to this resolution if only it didn't cost so much in taxpayer money. Synavia cares about the environment, and will do everything it can to help it out, so long as it doesn't force our tax rate above 60%.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Government officials like to be paid, and pay means more taxes.Baelgaria wrote:Miles underground?Hippo wrote:We do not support this proposal, as the Hippo River is a nice little place to dump all our toxic stuff. Where would we put all of our toxic materials if we couldn't dump it into the river and to the sea?Then send government officials to check up on the supposed dumping sites?President Newlark wrote:Darth GW7 wrote:President Newlark wrote:Synavia is against this resolution, it would cost too much in taxpayer money. I say this because my citizens, having a 49% income tax rate, surely do not need any more.
Then force the companies to pay the necessary money required for dumping the hazardous materials, and give them huge fines if they violate it.
Unfortunately, in Synavia, large corporations tend to be against the law (a trait dating from the age of President Adams). They'd just lie about it. I would agree to this resolution if only it didn't cost so much in taxpayer money. Synavia cares about the environment, and will do everything it can to help it out, so long as it doesn't force our tax rate above 60%.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
There are such things as loans and bonds; hiring more officials doesn't mean you need to raise taxes.
Last edited by Premier Annenkov on Fri May 20, 2011 9:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Premier Annenkov- Posts : 72
Join date : 2011-03-02
Location : Cherkasy, Kyzl
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
It's not only a matter of money, it's a matter of priority. Currently, I'm trying to get a new fleet of BMW M3's to replace our police car fleet.Premier Annenkov wrote:There are such things as loans and bonds, hiring more officials doesn't mean you need to raise taxes.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
And you were wondering what Government Waste was?President Newlark wrote:It's not only a matter of money, it's a matter of priority. Currently, I'm trying to get a new fleet of BMW M3's to replace our police car fleet.Premier Annenkov wrote:There are such things as loans and bonds, hiring more officials doesn't mean you need to raise taxes.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Too expensive. We had to build an underground cave so we could dump our radioactive material somewhere, and that was bloody expensive. Imagine if we had to build thousands of caves like that.. And we still couldn't fit all our toxic materials thereBaelgaria wrote:
Miles underground?
Enjoy your trees, I'll enjoy my booming economy.President Newlark wrote:
You're an idiot, you know that? The environment is much more important than your [whiney]little toxic waste problem[/whiney].
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Hippo wrote:Too expensive. We had to build an underground cave so we could dump our radioactive material somewhere, and that was bloody expensive. Imagine if we had to build thousands of caves like that.. And we still couldn't fit all our toxic materials thereBaelgaria wrote:
Miles underground?Enjoy your trees, I'll enjoy my booming economy.President Newlark wrote:
You're an idiot, you know that? The environment is much more important than your [whiney]little toxic waste problem[/whiney].
![Rolling Eyes](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Good old-fashioned Ford Crown Vics are a lot better than some fancy BMW's.. And they're cheaper and more efficient too!Baelgaria wrote:
And you were wondering what Government Waste was?
![Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion- Policecopy](https://2img.net/r/ihimg/m/96/1303/policecopy.png)
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
We know they're expensive, but they're necessary as all interstates heve become Autobahns. We need to cope with speeders in Lamborghinis at 180 mph.Hippo wrote:Good old-fashioned Ford Crown Vics are a lot better than some fancy BMW's.. And they're cheaper and more efficient too!Baelgaria wrote:
And you were wondering what Government Waste was?
See the thread about it.
Your Crown Victorias don't have 414 horsepower V8 engines with a redline of 8,400 rpm, do they?
I didn't think so.
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
It's called a helicopter, they can go much faster than cars.
Premier Annenkov- Posts : 72
Join date : 2011-03-02
Location : Cherkasy, Kyzl
Re: Resolution: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -Discussion-
Yes; they're also quite a bit more expensive and difficult to maneuver on roads. You can't quite pull someone over in one.Premier Annenkov wrote:It's called a helicopter, they can go much faster than cars.
![-](https://2img.net/i/empty.gif)
» Resolution #013: Imposing Limits on Water Pollution -FAILED-
» Resolution to create regional limits on the restriction of Civil and Political rights
» Possibility of imposing an import tariff on Cheese product.-DISCUSSION OVER
» Resolution to end deforestation -DISCUSSION-
» Resolution [#SS014] Prohibition of the Destruction of Artificial Intelligences -Discussion-
» Resolution to create regional limits on the restriction of Civil and Political rights
» Possibility of imposing an import tariff on Cheese product.-DISCUSSION OVER
» Resolution to end deforestation -DISCUSSION-
» Resolution [#SS014] Prohibition of the Destruction of Artificial Intelligences -Discussion-
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
» Yao Ming will vote quizzes retired major auction items
» Taking my leave
» Stunning revelation shakes Synavi government to its foundations
» Prepare for war brethren.
» Synavia complies with Security Council decisions
» State of New Synavia: 7/31/11
» Synavia would like to apply for Sermoan motorsports. 'Nuff said.
» Viktor Kasik re-elected!