Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Apyx Sun May 01, 2011 2:24 pm

Given that the Apyx Commonwealth has been ignored by the international cartographian community, it was decided that the expansion of the Commonwealth and it's ensuing grounds of commerce would be best enacted via a more colonial-esque methodology. Considering our economic position, I, Robert Tremaire, Chief Chairmen of the Commonwealth Council must lay this down to the international community.

Over the past twenty-four hours significant elements of the Apyx Commonwealth Navy have been deployed along the coast of the once-state of Valkry. This force includes the entire amphibious landing complement of our naval arm, fully manned and ready to effect a forced entry of the country should others attempt to intervene. In addition, our two carrier battle-groups have been deployed to support this operation.

All this force shall not be required, however, if rather than hastily acting to impose a forceful and unjust will upon the people of Apyx, you instead allow us to expand freely into the once-nation of Valkry, bringing not only our profitable and well-balance economic system, but also new markets for expansion into.

Select units within the 1st, 4th and 7th Mobile Battalions have been deployed in advance to prepare the landing zones for our vaunted Dragoons and their accompanieing Panzer regiments. They will return fire if you attempt to impede their progress.

Apyx Naval Deployments - Valkryian Coastal Regions

Carrier Group Venture

Vikrant-class Carrier – ACV Profit Margin
1st Naval Air Squadron – 15 MiG-29Ks
2nd Naval Air Squadron – 14 MiG-29Ks
1st Naval Rotary Squadron – 10 Lynx HMA8s

Daring-class Destroyer – ACV Hedge Fund
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Philanthropist
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Charitable View
Absalon-class Support Frigate– ACV Common Value
Type-212-class Attack Submarine – ACV Insolvent

Carrier Group Endeavour

Vikrant-class Carrier – ACV Capital Interests
3rd Naval Air Squadron – 15 MiG-29Ks
4th Naval Air Squadron – 14 MiG-29Ks
2nd Naval Rotary Squadron – 10 Lynx HMA8s

Daring-class Destroyer – ACV Building Society
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Bill of Exchange
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Exchequer Revenue
Absalon-class Support Frigate– ACV Audit Councillor
Type-212-class Attack Submarine – ACV Bankruptcy

Amphibious Group Acquisition

Juan Carlos-class LHD – ACV Market Impact
1st Apyx Mobile Battalion – 650 Men, 12 L118s
1st Apyx Panzer Regiment – 250 Men, 46 Leopard 2Es
5th Naval Air Squadron – 7 Harrier GR9As
3rd Naval Rotary Squadron – 8 Chinook CH-47Fs
4th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As

Daring-class Destroyer – ACV Subsidised Industry
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Position Trader
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Debt Snowball

Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Dividend Tax
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Time Horizon
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Direct Deposit

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Present Value
2nd Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
2nd Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
5th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
6th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Basis Risk
3rd Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
3rd Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
7th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
8th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Bay-class LSD – ACV Financial Capital
1st Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Bay-class LSD – ACV Yield Curve
2nd Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Type 212-class Attack Submarine – ACV Pension Plan

Amphibious Group Deregulation

Juan Carlos-class LHD – ACV Fiscal Policy
4th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 650 Men, 12 L118s
4th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 250 Men, 46 Leopard 2Es
6th Naval Air Squadron – 7 Harrier GR9As
9th Naval Rotary Squadron – 8 Chinook CH-47Fs
10th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As

Daring-class Destroyer – ACV Balanced Budget
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Future Trader
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Interest Rate

Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Stock Price
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Pairs Trade
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Delta Neutral

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Eminent Domain
5th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
5th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
11th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
12th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Market Depth
6th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
6th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
13th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
14th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Bay-class LSD – ACV Home Equity
3rd Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Bay-class LSD – ACV Liquid Assets
4th Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Type 212-class Attack Submarine – ACV National Debt

Amphibious Group Escheat

Juan Carlos-class LHD – ACV Hostile Merger
7th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 650 Men, 12 L118s
7th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 46 Leopard 2Es
7th Naval Air Squadron – 7 Harrier GR9As
15th Naval Rotary Squadron – 8 – Chinook CH-47Fs
16th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As

Daring-class Destroyer – ACV Escape Clause
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Credit Rating
Ivar Huitfeldt-class Frigate – ACV Trial Balance

Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV General Ledger
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Financial Audit
Absalon-class Support Frigate – ACV Debt Expense

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Equitable Foreclosure
8th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
8th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
17th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
18th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Mistral-class LPD – ACV Compulsory Purchase
8th Apyx Mobile Battalion – 700 Men
8th Apyx Panzer Regiment – 200 Men, 40 Leopard 2Es
19th Naval Rotary Squadron – 12 Lynx AH9As
20th Naval Rotary Squadron – 4 Lynx HMA8s

Bay-class LSD – ACV Deed of Trust
5th Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Bay-class LSD – ACV Strata Title
6th Apyx Dragoon Battalion – 356 Men, 40 Bradley IFVs

Type 212-class Attack Submarine – ACV Small Print

**Cisco Zarandin** Sun May 01, 2011 2:33 pm

Apyx wrote:-psot-

I am okay with taking the land, but, there is no way in hell your nation has nearly enough money for all of that.

*ahem*

You can actually after further calculations. Carry on.

Grand Administrator Crude Mon May 02, 2011 1:18 am

just throwing this out here- but what countries did you waltz through to go to the sea, board, then do a beach landing anyway.

I'm totally not ridiculing you in any way but besides that I'm just curious.

EDIT:

Wait you're not greater sermo, how silly of me. Disregard the above but take insult anyway if you want to.

I'm also looking at the sermo map thinking where the hell you are on it.

Hippo Mon May 02, 2011 5:29 am

Nope, you're not taking that land

I'm deploying the Hippostanian Navy and Marine Corps to prevent the annexation. I suggest that you withdraw your troops immidiately or else I'll invade you D:<

Also, have some realistic scale navy. Also, remember that this is just the navy. I'm deploying my marines too. BEWARE! >:3

HIPPOSTANIAN NAVY

Aircraft Carriers
13 Nimitz class aircraft carriers
-HNS Alcide De Gasperi
-HNS Altiero Spinelli
-HNS François Mitterrand
-HNS Guy Verhofstadt
-HNS Helmut Kohl
-HNS Jacques Delors
-HNS Jan Willem Beyen
-HNS Jean Monnet
-HNS Joseph Bech
-HNS Konrad Adenauer
-HNS Richard Nikolaus
-HNS Robert Schuman
-HNS Winston Churchill

Aircraft Carrier Equipment
-220 F/A-18 Super Hornets
-50 E-2 Hawkeyes
-50 EA-18G Growlers
-80 Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawks

Combat Support Ships
20 Supply class fast combat support ships

Corvettes
25 Visby class corvettes
-HNS Alderney
-HNS Argenteuil
-HNS Brighton
-HNS Créteil
-HNS Croydon Cross
-HNS Durham
-HNS Epping
-HNS Fôretchateau
-HNS Gatwick
-HNS Greenwich
-HNS Lakeside
-HNS Milton Keynes
-HNS Moncton-Monceau
-HNS Martintown-Martigny
-HNS New Montserrat
-HNS Northmount
-HNS Nouvelle Acadie
-HNS Riverspring
-HNS Saint Henrik
-HNS Saint Laurent
-HNS Stanstead
-HNS Virmire
-HNS Waverley
-HNS Williamstown
-HNS Wokingham

Cutters
300 Sentinel class cutters

Destroyers
20 Arleigh Burke class destroyers
30 Type 45 destroyers

Frigates
80 Type 23 frigates
40 Freedom class frigates

Minesweepers
60 Avenger class minesweepers

Submarines
30 Virginia class submarines

Darth GW7 Mon May 02, 2011 8:20 am

It is not your place to decide whether or not this colonisation is allowed to take place.

Stand down, hippo. It's for the senate to decide, just as it always has been.
You're always so fast to jump to military action; perhaps your last warning from the security consulate was not enough?

Hippo Mon May 02, 2011 8:56 am

Darth GW7 wrote:It is not your place to decide whether or not this colonisation is allowed to take place.

Stand down, hippo. It's for the senate to decide, just as it always has been.
You're always so fast to jump to military action; perhaps your last warning from the security consulate was not enough?

Well, you certainly are pretty bitchy when I try to annex land. When other people try to annex land, you're like ''OHHH IT'S FINE DON'T BE A MEANIE''

I don't care. I'm still deploying my troops to Valkry.

Darth GW7 Mon May 02, 2011 10:05 am

I was against your annexing land.
I did NOT, however, instantly engage in military intervention. I let the senate have time to sort things out.

Apyx Mon May 02, 2011 11:03 am

I believe the Administrator of Baclav has caught onto the reasoning behind this hostile merger of what used to be a nation seemingly built upon Norse mythology, and our own rather more modern and capable state. While we might exist, our existance has not been deemed worthy of consideration by the internationary cartographic community - pointing no fingers towards those present here - which has placed an understandably negative influence upon our buisness prospects, not to say the country as a whole.

As such, we - being the Commonwealth Council - decided that, given the state of not only countries dissolving into anarchy, but simply ceasing to exist entirely as a governmental entity, there were significant areas of land which would serve the purpose of giving Apyx a form and life, at least within the realms of Sermo. It is understood that members of the population from the prievious once-country might remain there though, and they will be given full citizenship along with assistance for integrating into our society.

Valkry was chosen not only due to it's coastal location which provided us with the capability to mount a amphibious landing, but also it's proximity to other Sermonian countries we have seen as possible trading partners and hopefully future companions within this international community. The hostile approach, while I understand it might be a little harsh, was chosen after considering recent unfortunate actions within the region. We decided it would be better to ensure the safety of the land, rather than throwing our own civilians into the war-zone because a... late decision was made to oppose us.

Moving onto the more unfortunate subject of the Hippostanian perspective of our actions, I am surprised that their Chancellor sees fit to threaten us with the entirity of their military force. While I may not be a strategist, I do understand that you will have commitments in other areas to uphold, and that maintenence tends to - if you pardon my vulgarity - bugger up ship numbers. I must also state to you that unlike your forces, ours have, even with this announcement - which our military leaders wished to postpone, but we decided it would be better this way - providing a forewarning, deployed into defensive positions. Maybe your advisors are better than mine, but I ask just how you are going to deploy over ten-thousand soldiers to Valkry, with all the support that a living man requires to fight a sustained war, in sufficient time to stop the units already landed?

I confess that I know little about the Hippostanian military, but I have my doubts when it comes to the basic facts of the situation. Chancellor, ultimately, you are saying that simply because we took the route of caution and deployed a forward element, we are worthy of being engaged with the full might and fury that might be pitched against a country such as Synavia, Avinistratus, Baelgaria, or even dare I say it, Jeniferia?

Consider the land that you are fighting over, as far as we can tell that at no point in history has it been a part of the Hippostanian-Empire. At most, it was a singular country, which unfortunately fell apart. In it's place, we are willing to expand the Apyx Commonwealth to not only enrich ourselves, but Sermo itself from our combined experiances and economic prowess. Note how, in the economic listings - which include us, unlike the cartographers - we are, per capita, actually quite a successful economy.

Given that this land is our nations entrance to this region as a whole upon the international scale, rather than simply being a few statistics in a listing, or a notation upon a graph, we will fight to defend it. Let that be known, that our forces will operate solely upon a defensive fashion within the Valkryian boundaries. Those boundaries and the waters around them are our future, and although we might request support in holding them, we shall not venture on for further gains, instead we want our home.

I am Robert Tremaire of the Commonwealth Council, thank you for your time.

Darth GW7 Mon May 02, 2011 11:07 am

//I actually shed a manly tear at that.

Hippo Mon May 02, 2011 12:03 pm

I can see that you know very little about the Hippostanian Armed Forces, but oh well.. There's only one thing you need to know: They are significantly larger than your armed forces. And why are we doing this? You said that the land of Valkry would be useful to the people of Apyx. Well, that land would be quite useful to the people of Hippostania too.
As we speak, Hippostanian Marine Corps are arriving to the shores of Southern Valkry. We will not attack your troops as long as you won't attack our troops. We consider this to be a peacekeeping operation, not a war.

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 46330827

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 46330827

Hippostanian Navy blackhawks heading towards Valkryan coast

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 26083543

Hippostanian Navy blackhawks arriving landing near the seaside town of Mirfield

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 18982692

An unfortunate accident caused one of our blackhawks to crash
//This really wasn't my original plan. Setting waypoints in ArmA 2 can be quite difficult, and sometimes things like this happen. I thought that it looked cool and decided to show it to you guys too :>

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 13099755

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 13099755

Hippostanian FOB (forward operating base) Zulu Bunsen near the village of Mirfield

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land 32576104

A surprised dog looking at a Hippostanian tank platoon heading towards the village of Mirfield

Darth GW7 Mon May 02, 2011 1:09 pm

You know full well that you cannot take that land, Hippo.
Or did you forget the senate's agreement regarding any further attempts from your nation to annex land from another?

Leave it to the senate, and stop shoving troops around without warning. I think this has gone on long enough.

Grand Administrator Crude Mon May 02, 2011 2:02 pm

TL;DR for everyone else: Apyx wants to enter sermo colonizing what I assume to be an inactive nation and Hippo is cockblocking him

SSSssssooo you're attacking Apyx because you just want the land right?

Unless Apyx completely ignores you, which is what I fully suggest him to do, this is the- what, 4th? war of Hippostanian aggression.

Request for change PLCL-FRN-016 has been issued in the administration, the personal perception of Grand Administrator Crude Oil will be changed to "Diplomatic and political trainwreck".

Apyx Mon May 02, 2011 3:11 pm

When I hear the comments put forward by the Hippostanian Chancellor I can't help but feel apprehensive. While Apyx may not yet be a fully fledged member of the regional community, we do keep up with the news. Jeniferia was an act of aggression towards them, but how many countries have the Hippostanian's occupied? Northwestern Plateau, Coastal Serenia, Praecursor, Feriron (Later partially legalised via senate hearing, I know.) and Synavia. I understand that a population can grow, but does that justify leaping into the ruins of what was once a nation simply because another country set foot within it?

I understand that Apyx might be seen as an outsider, a pariah in comparison to this closely-knit multi-national community, yet even taking that into account I notice the double-speak entwined within the Chancellors words. After speaking of the 'only thing I need to know' seemingly being if I'm larger or smaller than my foe - no ethical or political quandaries, I see - then goes on to state how, if the land which made up Valkry would be useful to Apyx, it should be useful to Hippostan as well. At that stage, he casually mentions that Hippostanian forces are deploying into Southern Valkry, and that it is in his eyes a 'peacekeeping' operation.

I have seen examples of peacekeeping operations in action, rarely are they deployed to a relatively stable area months after the collapse of order. Given that the Hippostanian 'peacekeeping force' seemingly includes significant armoured elements, I am forced to reject his claim that it is such, and instead consider it as a hostile threat to Apyx, not simply from a perspective of land - as far as we've seen, no Sermonian cartographer has even taken interest in us! - but instead as a nation. In this case, some might speak of the 'ultimate defence of the realm', but we all know that shouldn't be needed here.

Instead, after consultation, and if I might be honest, several lectures from our military advisors, we reached a seemingly favorable conclusion. Below you can see the area of effect our military can project at this stage. Specific unit concentrations have been edited out in accordance with protocols for the protection of our military forces, but you can see the circle indicating the zone within which our Amphibious Warfare groups are operating, and the current maximum deployment radius for their armoured units.

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Valkrymap

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Valkrymap

At the edges of this radius, we have deployed our Mobile Infantry battalions. These heli-borne units and their integral artillery/anti-tank support have been positioned not only to stem any attempted advance upon our landing zones, but also where they can conduct territorial observation. We would like to learn more about the indigenous population of course, the more the better when offering them the opportunity to join our people.

In addition to the ground forces, the blue deployment zone represents the area within which our naval units are authorised to use offensive measures in the means of their defence. I make this clear as to avoid any incidents, outside of this zone our naval units will mount purely defensive measures until fired upon.

I do not know if you Sermonians have heard of our Panzer regiments or the Dragoon battalions, but we know the Hippostanians will learn just how ferocious they can truly be, should they decide to press onward with this act of aggression into our deployment areas. Further deployments by the Hippostanians into Valkry beyond their current coastal measure will be dealt with as transgressions upon the Commonwealth of Apyx.

I did not wish for such a state of being, yet unfortunately, history sometimes requires the application of force. I hope the Sermonian states will understand the precident that would be laid down here if the Hippostanians are allowed to simply stamp out our foothold within the local community, in their greed for - if you excuse the term - lebensraum.

Chairman of the Commonwealth Council, Robert Tremaire.

**Cisco Zarandin** Mon May 02, 2011 3:42 pm

Hippostania, my decision is final in this matter.

Withdraw your troops from Valkry at once, what he is doing is completely justified. If this pathetic excuse of land grabbing continues we will enact the demilitarization of Hippostania at once.

//Seriously he's just trying to roleplay his way into Sermo fuck off.

Viktor Kasik Mon May 02, 2011 5:02 pm

I do not support either side and I believe that both Apyx and Hippostania should remove their men from Valkyr and the Senate should set up a time and date to meet and speak about what must be done about these countries with no leadership.

Hippo Tue May 03, 2011 6:41 am

I don't want that land. It's quite far away from Hippostania, that land is useless to us. And I don't care if you don't believe me, if I wanted to annex that land, I would've already created 27 different flag proposals, 8 different coat of arms proposals and several photoshopped pictures of people waving Hippostanian flags.

''But why are we doing this then?'' you might ask. Well, the answer is simple. To prevent the Apyxian annexation of Valkry. And why? Because we consider it highly hypocritical that it took weeks of negotiations until Hippostania managed to annex one-third of Feriron into Hippostania. 1/3. And now Apyx is annexing a whole country, and the nations of Sermo actually support it? Same thing with the KrauShan annexation of Western Vendettian Hollows. This has to end. Either all nations must have a right to annex inactive nations, or no one can. It's all or nothing.

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Unledhg

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Unledhg

This is the area where the Hippostanian Marines are currently operating. Because I'm pretty sure that you people still think that I want to annex Valkry, I'm going to return my three deployed M1A1 Abrams tanks back to Hippostania. They're useless in a peacekeeping operation, smaller armored vehicles such as Bradleys and Strykers will do the job quite nicely.
Also, we will not bring any more marines into Southern Valkry nor will we expand up north.

I agree that people shouldn't just recklessly annex inactive nations like Valkry or Jeniferia.
We are willing to donate the annexed part of Western Feriron back to Feriron if a Sermo Senate decision regarding inactive decision is made. I find it quite unfair that some nations can annex large amounts of land because all nations around them are inactive, but some nations can't annex any land at all because all nations around them are active. This has to change, the current situation is unbearable.

And one last thing. We are not in war with Apyx. We're not planning to start a war against Apyx.

Grand Administrator Crude Tue May 03, 2011 7:12 am

- You are an idiot
- He is colonizing it, not annexing it. indicating that the valkry is probably inactive.
- You're ignoring our region's founder. though the region focuses on democracy I wholly support the despotic position of Ocasus to tell you to jog on
- You say the land is useless to you and you're just 'preventing the Apyxian annexation of Valkry', even though you said in a different post which you edited that you would just repel him because you wanted the land

- just
- stop
- posting

Hippo Tue May 03, 2011 7:19 am

Grand Administrator Crude wrote:- You are an idiot
- He is colonizing it, not annexing it. indicating that the valkry is probably inactive.
- You're ignoring our region's founder. though the region focuses on democracy I wholly support the despotic position of Ocasus to tell you to jog on
- You say the land is useless to you and you're just 'preventing the Apyxian annexation of Valkry', even though you said in a different post which you edited that you would just repel him because you wanted the land

- just
- stop
- posting

- What a nice way to start a post. Oh well..
- I have not said that I want to annex Valkry. If you'd know me, you'd know that if I wanted to annex something, this thread would've already been filled with flag proposals and stuff like that.
- Until a few hours ago, I wasn't really aware that Apyx wasn't annexing Valkry, but instead they were merely colonizing it. That was my mistake, I can't deny it. Sorry :S
- After we got our M1A1 Abrams's out of Valkry, our marines have no offensive capability whatsoever. A few Bradley IFV's is all they got.
- At the moment, we're not withdrawing our troops. However, we're actively planning it and the we'll most likely begin withdrawing the marines within the next 24 hours.

Apyx Tue May 03, 2011 6:13 pm

While I am pleased to see the withdrawal of your Panzers - although their low number seems more as though they were deployed for gesturing, rather than an actual combat unit - I personally rode with a platoon of Dragoons once, back in my days as a mere Political Shareholder. It wasn't more than a fortnight, and I was simply acting as an observer rather than a fully fledged member of the section, but I saw how effective a well-drilled IFV platoon can be when used in an offensive manner.

As such, our defensive units were ordered not to advance further, but instead retaining their positions - and enact a posture suitable to the forces deployed against them. We were of course, expecting a few of your scouts to run into us at most. Instead, we were introduced to what seems to be a rather unfortunate method employed by those military units under your command - seeing what they want, rather than what there is.

I believe the Hippostanian Mariners might be rather more impetuous than you believe, Chancellor. As your military so helpfully presented their map without any form of comparison, it slipped past both of us initially that their operating area just protrudes into our defensive line. As such, our first contact with your forces - at least, from the reports I have read - wasn't a hesitant forward echelon advancing to scope our forward line, but instead a mechanised platoon rolling right towards our forces - in the reports own words - 'fully bunged up and ready for war'.

Considering that the element positioned for the defensive operation - consisting of a single Dragoon section of six men and an IFV, supported via a two-man TOW team in this case - wouldn't be capable of engaging a platoon on even terms, they took the initiative and engaged the force closing upon the deployment area. The picture below was taken by a section-member of the aftermath.

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Borderconflict

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Borderconflict

The report says that the IFVs supporting the platoon were targeted, and destroyed by the TOW team working with the Dragoon's IFV. Following this the accompanying Mariners in their APCs attempted to deploy and engage, but fire from the IFV's cannon was enough to disable their APCs, causing them to retreat. I extend my apologies to the families of those wounded or killed in this engagement, and the Commonwealth will extend financial reparations to them upon the condition that no further Hippostanian transgressions of the defensive line take place. It should be noted that this extends to the maritime regions of Valkry, as we honestly would prefer the withdrawal of the Hippostanian Mariners to go without incident.

On a lighter note at least, with the deployment of the amphibious complement complete, our vessels are returning to the Commonwealth to act as transports, not just for further defensive material, but the specialist teams which will begin the reconstruction of Valkryian infrastructure so that the process of reforming this land into a successful and profitable nation might get underway.

Argulor Tue May 03, 2011 7:36 pm

Argulor would like to agree with the other nations, stating that what Apyx is doing is completely just, as the people of the once nation of Valkry deserves a stable and strong government, and stating that Hippo should get out of Valkry as soon as possible.

Hippo Wed May 04, 2011 6:08 am

Four Hippostanian Bradley IFV's have been destroyed. Three soldiers have been killed. 16 soldiers have been injured, six of them seriously. Under normal conditions, we would've already launched a full-scale invasion of Apyx and bombed your cities to dust. But due to to heavy international pressure and some internal pressure too (Three wars in two months is too much for some Hipponians) we'll have to reconsider that. However, if you still want that our troops will leave Valkry before weekend, you will have to accept these demands:

- You will pay for the damage you caused to our four Bradley IFV's
- You will pay an adequate compensation to the families of soldiers that were killed or injured in your attack
- You will not attack our troops again and we will keep our troops away from your defensive line.
- You will allow our field hospital to operate until May 14th, after all other marines have left Valkry. Some of the injured soldiers are too weak to be evacuated, and they will die if we try to move them any earlier.

Just say yes and we'll start moving our soldiers out.

Darth GW7 Wed May 04, 2011 6:36 am

Why should he pay compensation when it's your own damn fault for stupidly "Intervening" in the first place?
Perhaps you should think before acting next time. I'm sure your people are VERY appreciative of you jumping blindly into military action with a nation that only seeked peaceful colonisation, not thinking of the consequences and resulting in the loss of three lives, lives that could have been spared had you simply used your single brain cell for a millisecond of time?

Make no mistake, the senate WILL make sure you leave, and leave as soon as possible. No reparations are required on Apyx' behalf. You made the stupid mistake, you will pay the price for your idiocy.

I look forward to seeing the results of your next election. I can see the headlines in the election campaign already, "Hippostania ruling party almost jumps into yet another war for no reason"

Hippo Wed May 04, 2011 6:47 am

It's funny how you actually defend a nation that is trying to annex another nation (even though that nation is inactive). I remember that how angry you were when I tried to annex an inactive nation.

Regarding my demands.. If Apyx won't accept them, I'm sure that we can negotiate a solution. War is my final solution if everything else fails, and believe me. I have lots of possible solutions before I have to start a war

~~Also, I don't think I'm able to hold elections for a while, my last elections were like little more than a month ago? It would be weird to hold elections once a month D:~~
EDIT: Actually, elections actually sound like a good idea!

Darth GW7 Wed May 04, 2011 6:55 am

You have no reason to start a war with Apyx. You unlawfully intervened with military action, they defended theirself justifiably. If you go even attempt to go to war the entire region will be against you.
And the reason I was against you annexing an inactive nation? You already had your place in Sermo set out for you. You had no justification for your aggressive, land-grabbing actions. This is a country seeking to peacefully integrate itself with our region, and it should be allowed to do so.

Hippo Thu May 05, 2011 5:41 am

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land Byefw

The newly elected Hippostanian Parliament has decided to end the peacekeeping operation in Valkry. Everyone are happy. Well, some people are unhappy but most people are happy. The end.

Sponsored content

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Re: Apyx Acquisition of Valkryian Land

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30